By Evelyne Asaala & Nicole Dicker
Abstract
This article considers the effectiveness of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya (TJRC). The recent submission of the final report of the TJRC to Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta on 21 May 2013 sets up the TJRC as topical and ripe for analysis. The TJRC was established in response to the harrowing two-month period of violence that devastated Kenya in the aftermath of disputed presidential elections in December 2007. Post-election violence resulted in the deaths of over 1,200 Kenyans and left hundreds of thousands displaced; many suffered abductions, illegal detentions, torture and ill-treatment, sexual violence, and property violations. The TJRC was established in order to promote peace, justice, national unity, healing, and reconciliation among the people of Kenya; to respond to the legacy of human rights violations marring Kenya’s development. Yet significant delays, allegations of corruption (including embezzlement of TJRC-designated funds), serious concerns surrounding the character and human rights record of the TJRC Chairperson, Ambassador Bethuel Kiplagat, and dubious political will for and alleged interference with the TJRC process, has diluted the success of the TJRC. Applying criteria for assessing truth commission effectiveness, this article critiques the effectiveness of Kenya’s truth-seeking project, and emphasises the importance of full implementation of the recommendations of the final report of the TJRC.
